Quickie: Reeder update review

Previously… yesterday the new 2.2 version of Reeder came out and amongst bug fixes and a couple of visual twiddles, the reason to remark was that it added background refresh. (Where instead of my getting the app to add the latest news whenever I open it, the app itself does that continually through the day.) I wondered whether this would work and whether it would make any difference if it did. Now read on.

It worked.

It makes a big difference.reeder

On the one hand it’s slightly disappointing because I’m used to the anticipation of waiting to see if there’s anything new to read and now I just know at a glance. But it’s unexpectedly faster. Logically, rationally, it can’t be saving me more than a few seconds compared to when I would have to wait for it to update in front of me, but it feels faster. Much faster.

I’m also reading more because of it. I find I clear down all the remaining articles and then the next time I pick up my iPhone, there’s an unread news notification. Who can resist?

Reeder for iOS is a universal app (so it’s for both iPhone and iPad) and costs £2.99 UK or $4.99 US. The Mac version is currently still free in beta but the finished and to-be-paid-for version was reportedly submitted to Apple about a week ago.

Reeder updated with background refresh

reederMy favourite newsreader app for iPhone and iPad has today been updated to version 2.2. It includes a lot of bug fixes (can’t say I ever noticed any bugs in my daily, near hourly use) and behind the scenes differences to how many news feeds it can handle. But the biggie, the reason to mention this instead of just update it on my iOS devices and forget about it is this:

Background app refresh (per account setting, disabled by default)

It sounds like such a small thing and perhaps it will be but I’m looking forward to trying it. Background app refresh means that Reeder will get news stories for me behind the scenes. I won’t even have to be in the app. So instead of opening it and refreshing the list for myself, I can pick up Reeder and know that it us up to date right now.

But.

You saw that bit about it being “disabled by default”. It took me a minute to find out where to switch the thing on.

To do that, go to Reeder and swipe left-to-right until you reach a screen with a settings cog wheel. Tap that, choose your account name toward the top of the screen that appears. In there, tap on Sync and change it from On Start or Manually to Background refresh. Then tap the < arrow to get out of that screen and the √ tick to confirm the change. Reeder for iOS is a universal app (so it’s for both iPhone and iPad) and costs £2.99 UK or $4.99 US. The Mac version is currently still free in beta but reportedly not for very much longer.

Have a production meeting for one

In The Blank Screen book, I argue that there are two types of meeting. I think I was wrong: I think there is or at least there could be a third type and that it is useful. To be clear, the two types were:

  • Pitch meetings where it’s all about you and your work
  • Day job meetings where it’s all about the day job

The first type is the one you want as a writer or any creative person. They are important you work to get as many of those as you can and to make each of them count. The second type is ditchwater-dull sort you are forced to have in your day job and I spend a lot of time in the book covering how you can get out of them and, since you usually can’t, what exactly you can do to make them faster and make them work and keep yourself awake.

You have to meet. But you don’t always have to meet and when you have ten people in a room doing bugger-all and getting nowhere slow, that is a gigantic waste of ten people’s time. I reckon the poster-boy worst example of this kind of thing is what I would often see at the BBC: everybody would gather for a meeting whose sole and entire purpose was for whoever ran it to tell his or her bosses that they had run this meeting.

All of this stands, all of this is true, but I forgot another type of BBC gathering: the production meeting. Sometimes called an editorial meeting. Believe it or not, I still think of them as the budget meeting – there is not one single element of them that is to do with money but that’s what these were called in Lou Grant, the show that made me a writer. (Budget Meeting was the US newspaper term for an editorial meeting and I imagine it comes from how you have a certain amount of space in a newspaper and you are budgeting this much room for that story, that much for this. Certainly these Lou Grant meetings regularly included background detail such as questions about giving this much space on the front page and continuing a story inside.)

These meetings are not about your writing work but they can be. And they are so useful that I’m embarrassed I didn’t mention them. Especially as I think you can use them yourself, you can conjure up a kind of production meeting for yourself.

Production meetings have certain things that are always the same. They are regular, for one thing. Newsrooms and news programmes tend to have them at least daily, almost invariably first thing. They are always focused on the same thing: BBC’s The One Show doubtlessly has a production meeting focused on that day’s edition. Anything that doesn’t belong or can’t go in today’s edition, doesn’t get discussed. Or probably not, anyway.

Then you have specific resources: this many people who can do this much in that time. Anything they can’t do, you don’t do – or you look for outside help, you schedule it all in some way that it becomes manageable over time.

Next, every person in the meeting brings ideas. That sounds so wishy-washy but production meeting ideas are not one-line blue-sky wouldn’t-it-be-nice-to-feature-daffodils-somehow things. They are one-line ideas that have every detail behind them that it would take to get that idea on the screen or on the page. You throw in your idea, if it isn’t liked or you can’t adapt it to one that is, it’s out. If it is or you can, you contribute exactly how it can be done. Or more likely, you just go off and do it.

Take a look at the BBC’s own requirements for ideas that get pitched at news production meetings. When ideas die, it’s a lot of wasted work. But when they fly, you’re ready to go. And the process works not just because the better ideas rise to the top in these meetings but because working at them this way gets you thinking of better ideas to pitch.

Last, production meetings almost always include some kind of diary discussion. Very broadly, there are two types of ideas discussed at a production meeting: diary items and non-diary items. There is always someone whose job it is to maintain the diary: not of where you and your colleagues are but of what is happening. I’ve worked in entertainment news so a diary I’d know would have things like press previews for this film today, that celebrity is in town Friday, this book is coming out next Thursday.

The BBC maintains the most exhaustive diary of everything that any news programme could want to know but your team knows what to take from that and your team also runs their own. Then non-diary items are everything else. If Coronation Street got cancelled, that would be news and it would never be a diary item: there’s no circumstance in which ITV would let journalists know that it will be cancelling Corrie in three weeks’ time. They could try, but you suspect the story would be written about instantaneously, don’t you?

It happens that this week I have a meeting about one event, I actually have an event, and there are some discussions about at least one other confirmed and one other possible gig for later in the year. My mind’s been going through what I need to bring to the meeting, what I need other people to agree to. And I’ve realised that my mind has been going through exactly what it used to with production meetings.

I miss them. I’ll be honest with you, I miss the rigour of having to come up with ideas, pitch them to a group and then either get them or be assigned some other idea to do my best with.

And it occurs to me that I could, perhaps I should, and probably I shall run some little production meetings of my own. Just for me. God, that sounds lonely and pathetic. But I think it might be useful.

I have diary and non-diary items to get done, for instance. This week should be devoted to the events but actually it can’t be, I have to do other things too so I have issues of resources and time.

I also have the shape of the week. When you work in radio or television you are conscious of time in a slightly different way: you think about the top of the hour, you think about your third-hour guest. You know you have to have a news bulletin at this point, you know you should start the show with a bang and that it would be good to finish with one too. I have the week where I know when my events are so I know what has to come before those, I know what I will have to postpone until afterwards.

And I know all this because my noggin’ just worked it all out while I was talking to you. So thank you for that – and I hope you find production meetings useful for your work too.

Use the news approach to get people listening

Nobody’s rude. Okay. Not many people are rude. Alright, the people you talk to and who get to work with you, they’re not rude. But they are all as busy as you are and it’s hard to get them to do what you need even if they need it to. Even if they want it too. (Hopefully you’re not spending a lot of time forcing people to do things they hate. You know that. I just had to say it.) Without trying to criticise the whole of humanity in one massive generalisation, here I am criticising the whole of humanity in one massive generalisation:

Faced between a massacre in a foreign country and stubbing your toe on a door frame, people fixate on the toe.

Because it’s closer.

Also, we’re horrible human beings, so, you know, there’s that.

But faced with everybody focusing on themselves and faced with the certain fact that you need people to work with you, do this. Do what every single television news bulletin you’ve ever seen does. This is a mantra for broadcast news:

Tell ’em what you’re going to tell ’em

Tell ’em it

Tell ’em what you’ve just told ’em

Why do you think news bulletins start with the headlines? If the top story is so important, why aren’t they just beginning with that? You can say it’s because the headlines are a quick way to see whether you want to watch the entire bulletin and I can then say aha, got you. That opening is how you get attention.

But look at the next bulletin that comes along or look at rolling news stations at the top of the hour. They headline the major stories yet they also headline smaller ones. Weather presenters now appear in the headline block saying things like “Will there be rain to spoil this weekend? Find out later on”. What is that doing in the news? Not in the headline block, why is it in the news at all? It’s weather – and they’re standing there refusing to tell us what it is. What is point teasing the weather?

The point is that they tell us what they’re going to tell us.

Then we get the news stories, we finally find out whether it’s going to rain.

And then we get “The headlines again”. Why?

Because it gets us watching and then it keeps us watching and finally it makes us remember. Three times’ the charm.

If you have to tell someone something or you know the work can’t be done, won’t be achieved, find three ways to tell them. Three ways and three times. You know it makes sense: you have seen it in action eleventy-billion times.

Creativity and the time of the month

Lifehacker has picked up on German studies that suggests firstly that women tend to be creative around their menstruation cycle – and secondly that so do the men nearby.

During the preovulatory phase, creativity was in general improved when serum concentrations of estrogen (E2) and luteinizing hormone (LH) were highest whereas motor perseveration decreased. In control women, there was no preovulatory improvement of divergent thinking and no preovulatory decrease in motor perseveration.

And:

A new study suggests that when young men interact with a woman who is in the fertile period of her menstrual cycle, they pick up on subtle changes in her skin tone, voice, and scent – usually subconsciously – and respond by changing their speech patterns.

Specifically, they become less likely to mimic the woman’s sentence structure. According to the researchers, this unintentional shift in language may serve to telegraph the man’s creativity and nonconformity – qualities that are believed to attract potential mates.

Both quotes reported in How Ovulation Affects Your Creativity (Even if You’re a Guy) – Lifehacker.com

Frankly, any time anyone says anything is down to a woman’s time of the month, I cringe. But if this is true – and do read the whole Lifehacker piece for more – then it’s also a bit depressing.

It suggests that people’s creativity is not theirs, it’s somehow tied to our body chemistry. It also suggests that we are stuffed after menopause.

fsdfsd

Get the Blank Screen newsletter free

From this coming Friday, April 18, The Blank Screen will also be available as a weekly email newsletter. Each Friday it will bring you the best posts from the last seven days of productivity news, features and reviews.

Plus it will also include Self Distract: not only an antidote to being productive but a money-where-my-mouth is demonstration of my writing. The Blank Screen is about getting you more time to write and I use this stuff every day so it's time I showed you. Self Distract is also about writing but the strapline for it is:

What we write and what we write with, when we get around to writing

You'll see what I mean. But I'm hoping you'll also see a lot of use for the email newsletter. During a typical week here on The Blank Screen, I publish very many pieces that are technical or particularly topical like news of 24-hour sales on particular apps. They're popular and they're useful, but sometimes they mean the longer, more distinctively Blank Screen productivity features get a bit lost.

The Blank Screen email newsletter will pull out the very best of those from the week plus a round up of the best technology pieces too.

The newsletter will be posted here on The Blank Screen site but you can get it early and you can get it delivered right to your email inbox by just signing up here. Click or tap on this link to send me an email saying you want to subscribe and you're in. You can also use that email to tell me anything you want to, but just hitting Send will do the job too.

I hope you sign up for a look and that you enjoy it.

Reeder for Mac now in public beta

Screen Shot 2014-04-11 at 20.45.55

The short news for Reeder fans: download it right now from here.

The slightly longer news for anyone who isn’t a Reeder fan: it is terrific and you should download it right now from here.

Reeder is a news reading app, an RSS one where you tell it what websites you like and forever afterwards it gets news from all of those sites. Depending on the site, you can read the headline, the standfirst, an extract or the whole article and whichever you get, it looks gorgeous. One tap in the morning and I am reading news from BBC, New York Times, Lifehacker, The Onion and myriad more.

There are many RSS readers like Reeder but I don’t think there is another one that is really anything like Reeder. I’ve long loved its design – most of it, at least – and how well done its text was. Routinely, if I found an article on a site that was just too ugly to read, I’d either bung that piece into Pocket to read later or I’d subscribe to it in Reeder and read it there.

I still remember the instant when I learnt that Reeder for iOS was out. Last September, a new version was released partly to deal with how Google shut down its service that powered all RSS readers. It was a paid update and I paid instantaneously. That’s how much I liked the old one and now it’s how much I like the new.

Yet as good as Reeder is for RSS, I missed having it on my Mac too. That Google shutdown made the Mac one literally unusable and that is almost a year ago. Here’s how good Reeder is: I haven’t replaced it. Not on my Mac. I’ve tried others on iOS but as much as I used to use RSS on my Mac, I simply stopped reading any RSS there.

Until tonight.

What’s been released is a beta version of Reeder 2 for Mac and the final version will be a paid-for app. I don’t know the price yet and I don’t truly care: I have read many thousands of articles through the various versions of Reeder and I open it practically as often as I do my email.

So go download it now from here and be ready to pay whatever the maker demands when it’s out of beta.

The Blank Screen on Croydon Radio

Hear about the origins of The Blank Screen on Croydon Radio's show From Croydon to Gallifrey, now online as a podcast here.

Janet went to Birmingham to interview William Gallagher author of the Big Finish latest release SCAVENGER as well as The Demons of Red Lodge and Other Stories, Wirrn Isle and Spaceport Fear. William also talks about a new Blake's 7 related book to be published soon.

Doesn't sound like it's about The Blank Screen, does it? But that also doesn't tell you that I got to choose some great music.

You can nip straight to my first appearance at about 30 minutes but then The Blank Screen and how it all began is around 90 minutes in.

How to block ads that bounce you to the App Store

It's the latest thing in advertising and instantly takes the crown for the most irritating. That's a crowded field, what with YouTube ads that play one fifth of a second of the video you want before running a commercial. Or all the popups over YouTube. It's mostly YouTube that's irritating, isn't it? But now we have ads where you read some website on your iPhone or iPad and before you take in a word, you are bounced out of Safari and into the App Store to buy some particular app.

Invariably that seems to be a game one. Usually you can see an ad for that same game on the site but sometimes there doesn't appear to be any connection between the site advertisers and the App Store game.

There is.

What there isn't – necessarily – is collusion with the website. Like you, I presumed that this was the latest type of ad that was being sold by websites to advertisers. But one major site told me that it was done without their knowledge or permission and definitely without any extra money being paid to them. He described it as the advertisers playing silly buggers and it was stopped.

There's your technical workaround, your blocker for these ads. Not a technical thing, not a JavaScript command, not a different browser with blocking extensions and definitely not jailbreaking your phone. Just email the website and tell them this is happening.

It's a bit of an old-fashioned approach, but it can work.

Warner Bros caves on Veronica Mars mistake

First: it is nothing short of wonderful that Veronica Mars has returned. Second: the movie is bliss. Not flawless by any means, but watching it in a cinema was bliss.

But.

The one fly in this whole Kickstarter campaign tale came with the digital download copy of the film that backers got. On release day, we got an email telling us how to download it for free – and because those instructions said we had to use Flixster/Ultraviolet, I just went and bought it from iTunes.

I backed the movie. I got that digital download and still I paid again to buy the movie from iTunes. And I did so because, strange fella that I am, I wanted to be able to watch the thing I downloaded.

True, I still went to see it in the cinema and actually I sat there with the film on my iPhone in my pocket. It was like the reverse of piracy: I could've played it for the audience right there.

The flash-forward quick ending to this is that Warner Brothers has caved in and said okay, enough already, you don't have to use Flixster. I'm sure there must be conditions but I've emailed my iTunes receipt to info@veronicamarsthemovie.com and will report when I get the refund.

Here's the thing, though. I would like you to see Veronica Mars because I enjoyed it so very, very much, but the reason to talk about it here on The Blank Screen is that I think there are productivity lessons to be learnt.

The positive one is that when you know something is wrong, fix it. Warner Bros has quite quickly responded to the criticism of the Flixster debacle and you have to give them credit for that.

But the more negative one is the same: when you know something is wrong, fix it – and Warner Bros did not. Flixster and Ultraviolet is an astonishing disaster of a service. No exaggeration. More than a year ago, I attempted to use it to get digital copies of The Big Bang Theory: I'd bought the DVD, I wanted to watch it on my iPad, it came with all the rights and the download details to do this for free. But I lost an evening trying to get it work. At all. To work at all.

I emailed the support team and explained that the service did not work. Literally did not work. They replied that they were sorry my first experience had been sub-optimal.

That was all, by the way. They had no answer for how to make it work, they just had hopes that I would keep trying.

I do understand why several studios have decided they'd rather not go via Apple's iTunes service. I get that and I'd be the same: naturally Apple takes a cut and the studios would rather keep the money for themselves but also it's risky being beholden to another firm. Apple has them over a barrel if iTunes is the only way to sell films. It isn't, there's Amazon too, but it's no better being beholden to Amazon. So of course some firms got together to make a new service.

Except they didn't.

They didn't get together and they didn't make a new service.

It's not a new service because it isn't a service: it literally does not work. You cannot take that Veronica Mars download code or that Big Bang Theory DVD and get what you want to watch and what you've paid to watch. In more than a year since I first tried it, they have improved one thing: you have to sign up to just two online services instead of three. I think. I may have successfully signed up to one last year. Honestly cannot tell you.

There is now also a bit of PR spin: some poor sod has written a paragraph about why hey, it's great to have two sign-ins!

No, it isn't.

Two (or three) sign-ins is visible evidence of them not getting together and the PR spiel is visible evidence of them recognising that this is crap but not doing anything to fix it. Having to sign up to two or three online sites in order to get one service is more as if all of the companies involved agree that they want to avoid being beholden to Apple and Amazon, but they also don't want to be in any way beholden to each other.

Fine. That makes sense.

Productivity means getting stuff done. Productivity for these fellas is getting films to us. They don't like that their choice is between being beholden to Apple and Amazon or being beholden to each other, but in technical terms that is just tough shit.

Make the choice, any choice, and do it.

If you want to get a particular project going and you can see what your choices are, make a choice now. Do that now. Especially if waiting more than a year means pretending something works when it simply does not. Especially if you manage to pull off something like Veronica Mars.

This film had an audience waiting for it. They paid $5.7m as proof. There are few absolute guaranteed audiences in this world but Veronica Mars had one and there is not one single pixel of doubt that every qualifying backer would download the movie the instant it was available. The audience was coming to Warner Bros and it was the perfect chance to show that iTunes is not the only player in town. The perfect chance to get people actively choosing to use your system and then even to come back to it again to watch this movie again.

This was Flixster's chance. It wouldn't have been easy because of people like myself who had sub-optimal first experiences and would never willingly try a second time. But if it had worked and all these fans were loving that movie immediately, even I would've gone back to try again.

Actually, I did try at one point: it became a game to see if I could figure this stuff out.

But for actually watching the movie, no. I read the email saying it was to be on Flixster and I went straight to iTunes. How bad does your service have to be that someone who has already paid for the film on it would instantly go to your biggest rival and pay money again to get it there?

By the way, do catch it in cinemas if you can. The joy in that auditorium was wonderful.