MarsEdit – the early review

This feels so wrong. So very wrong. Also a bit meta. I’m reviewing MarsEdit, a blogging editor for OS X, but I’m reviewing it for MacNN.com. I’ll tell you now that I already like this software enough that I’ll be recommending it on The Blank Screen too.

But the way of these things is that of course I review it first on MacNN and then when that’s live, I’ll point you at it from here.

Except.

Not only do I need to test out MarsEdit, I also need some screenshots. So unless all my testing so far has somehow been mistaken and this post vanishes into the ether, you’re looking at a test post. Goes on a bit, doesn’t it? What’s wrong with “testing 1, 2, 3”? Standards. It’s about standards.

But while I’ve got you, let me say that MarsEdit is for writing and editing your blog posts and what I think is best about it is that it is somehow just an enjoyable thing to type into. Officially, sensibly, the best thing about it is how readily you can add text, images, video and audio into your posts – and how those posts can be across any number of different blogs that you run.

Yes! Chocolate improves your memory

There’s more to this, in fact there’s a lot more and it’s all to do with improving your memory or something, but I focused only on tip number 1:

1. Nibble on chocolate: Just this week, we learned that eating chocolate might lessen age-related memory loss. Columbia University researchers studied almost 40 adults between 50 and 69 years old, and found that those who drank a high-flavanol cocoa mix every day for three months performed better on memory tests and had higher activity in the area of the brain linked with memory

Ways To Boost Your Memory – Samantha Zabell, Real Simple (no date)

Read the full piece for the rest. Best to get a bar of Bournville dark chocolate first, though. For some reason. Hat tip to Time magazine for spotting this on 31 December 2014.

My favourite iPhone and iPad app…

…is really two separate apps in that you have to buy them separately. And in that one came out in this latest, great version late last year while the other was only a few weeks ago. But it’s already become so indispensable that I had to check the release date twice before I’d believe it was that recent.

The 2014 release was for the iPad. The 2013 one was for iPhone. There was also a 2014 one for the Mac. Are you getting it yet?

That’s OmniFocus 2 for iPad there. If I could pick only one app for the year, this would be it. If you can only afford to buy one version of OmniFocus, it’s the iPad one you should get. Both decisions are easy: it’s that good.

But for the overall best-app-ever experience, I do of course recommend you get all three editions. I used to say that this To Do manager was so good, was so important to my business and frankly my life now that I would cheerily, readily pay the cost price of all three over again. I don’t say that so much now – because I did do. The Omni Group brought out new editions of the Mac, iPhone and iPad OmniFocus and I bought the lot on the day they were released.

And I will again whenever they do OmniFocus 3.

Go take a look on the official site where you can also get the Mac version. Then head to the iOS App Store for the separate iPhone and iPad ones. Also to the Mac App

Debate what needs to be debated, nothing else

When you have a project you want to do, there are going to be bits you really need to think about and bits that you really need to debate with people.

But there are also bits you don’t.

So do those.

I’ve been in meetings where because the overall issue was big and needed thought, people spent time on the piddling easy and obvious stuff. I realise it’s a way of churning over the detail and processing it, but you end up with people raising objections that are word for word an issue you’ve already said to them. Where you said there’s thing we’ll need to look at, they come back with yeah, but we can’t do this entire project because of this thing. It’s the same thing but they tell you it like it’s news and they tell you it like that’s the end of the deal instead of an issue to fix.

They might be right but, jaysis, it’s irritating.

You also get objections that are simply embarrassing. Again, they come from this process of churning and thinking, they’re half-formed but again you have to deal with them. I was in a meeting three weeks ago where I said “Tough tum tiddly” about a potential problem someone raised. I got the gig, too, so maybe I should say tough tum tiddly more.

When you’re in the throes of this though, give them the time to think and give them the respect that they may know more than you do. But if it looks like it’s going to take a long time and that time will be spent on the embarrassingly tough tum tiddly details, make the call. Is it good enough to continue despite this, are any of their objections useful, are they ever going to get this thing done?

Too often the answers are all no. In which case, take it away and do it yourself or do it somewhere else.

And, by the way, tough tum tiddly.

Dig yourself out of the pile of not done To Dos

We’ve all been there. The half-written to-do list stretching the length of your arm. The incessant notifications calling for our attention. The feeling of drowning in a list of never ending tasks — from a computer waiting to be configured, to an unplayed game, to a terrifyingly busy inbox. The backlog, we fear, is here to stay. But here are 10 tips for clawing your way out of this predicament.

10 Ways To Dig Yourself Out Of Task Backlogs – Rob Nightingale, Make Use Of (26 November 2014)

Read the full piece.

US bans Google Glass from cinemas

Google Glass and other wearable devices are now officially off-limits in the cinema.

On Wednesday, the MPAA and the National Association of Theatre Owners (NATO) announced an update to their joint policy to prevent film theft in theaters, prohibiting recording by users equipped with Google Glass or other wearables in theaters.

The update “was made to fully integrate wearable tech into the rules following a joint meeting of NATO and MPAA theatrical anti-piracy teams,” the lobbying orgs said. The announcement was made at ShowEast 2014, NATO’s annual industry confab in Hollywood, Fla.

Movie Industry Officially Bans Google Glass, Other Wearable Devices – Todd Spangler, Variety (29 October 2014)

Read the full piece.

Weekend read: this is the first-ever advert on the internet

Here it is:

IMG_0806.GIF

And now the only answer is no, not deliberately. At least we think we don’t click on banner ads but enough people do that the world keeps moving and has done so for twenty years now. For this is the twentieth anniversary of the web banner ad and if you’re not in the mood to celebrate, read anyway because The Internet History Podcast has a remarkably interesting story.

It begins:

Of course, it’s not *technically* the first banner ad. There was no “one” first banner ad. Instead, there were around 12-14 banners, which all went live 20 years ago today, on October 27th, 1994. That was when the website HotWired.com first launched on the internet.

What follows is the story of the world’s first banner ad (or ads). This topic may not seem like something to celebrate, but think about this:

Basically, the majority of the web and the Internet are subsidized by ads.

The net as we know it today would not exist without ads. There would be no Google search. No Gmail. No Facebook. No Twitter. No Reddit. Nor any website that you can use basically for free…

Without advertising, that is.

Sure, there are huge sections of the Internet that function on a different revenue model (Amazon, eBay, iTunes and other things come to mind) but the vast majority of the online world we love is underpinned by an economic infrastructure of advertising.

This is the story of how that infrastructure was fist built, by the people who conceived and designed the very first banners.

On The 20th Anniversary, An Oral History of the Web’s First Banner Ads – Brian McCulloch, Internet History Podcast (27 October 2014)

Read the full piece where you can also listen to the podcast version.

Weekend read: hiding through razzle dazzle

You are reading the only sentence I may ever write about cars. That was it. Right there. You’re welcome to re-read it, but you’ve already got everything out of it about cars that I have ever or will know. It is for want of trying. But still, this fascinated me: new cars are being tested out in public and they are painted in the most astonishing crazy ways – in order to hide them:

It seems that the adoption of “dazzle” to hide car designs coincided with the explosion of consumer cameras, and more so with the ubiquity of smartphones. GM told me that the practice began in the late 1980s, but didn’t really explode until the 1990s. “In recent years with the rise of smartphones and mobile internet devices, the vehicle camouflaging technique has really escalated to a technique used for the entire lineup,” the company’s reps added.

So, how does it work? Dazzle camouflage sounds oxymoronic: Why would you cover something you want to disguise with vivid, contrast-heavy patterns? It’s actually one of the primary concepts of camo, found both in nature and manmade systems. Think of a white tiger with black stripes. Those stripes run perpendicular to the line of the lion’s limbs, and in this way, they break up the continuous form of the animal itself. Along the same lines, Army camouflage is designed to break up the lines of soldiers’ arms and legs.

How Automakers Use a WWI-Era Camo Technique to Disguise Prototype Cars – Kelsey Campbell-Dollaghan, Gizmodo (17 October 2014)

It’s a fascinating article that takes in the history of ships where camouflage was a bit more life-and-death than a car marker’s bottom line. Read the full piece.

This tickles me: today is a non-standard World Standards Day

I didn’t know that it existed at all, let alone that it was today. But today is World Standards Day, except when it isn’t. The Atlantic:

Happy World Standards Day! The International Organization for Standardization has declared today, October 14, to be a celebration of the hundreds of engineering and scientific standards from which we all benefit—everything from the length of a meter to the two-letter country code system.

It is a day, in other words, to commemorate cross-national conformance, connection, and collaboration.

But the U.S. will not be observing World Standards Day today, on World Standards Day. Instead, the U.S. will observe World Standards Day next week, on October 23.

U.S. Observes ‘World Standards Day’ on Non-Standard Day – Robinson Meyer, The Atlantic (14 October 2014)

There is a reason. It does kinda make sense. A bit. But that’s no fun at all. Move along if you’d rather have a little chortle like I did or read the full piece if you want to see what gauzy excuse the US has.